| Christopher: profilCEEK Technology AT and M...BlogSeznamySíť | Nápověda |
|
31 října FW: Week in review: Motorola, Verizon ready the Droid
Dear Blog
Sincerely, Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:21:35 -0700 Subject: Week in review: Motorola, Verizon ready the Droid
Windows 7: It helps you do more. Explore Windows 7. 30 října FW: New Addition to Window-Eyes Phone Training: Script Training
FYI
Sincerely, Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:17:52 +0000 Subject: New Addition to Window-Eyes Phone Training: Script Training For Your Information!! Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via GW Micro - Latest News RSS Feed on 10/28/09 Have you wanted to use scripts with Window-Eyes, but you are not sure how? Do you need some...Things you can do from here:
Windows 7: It works the way you want. Learn more. 29 října FW: Free e-book: Windows 7 troubleshooting tips
Dear Blog Site
Sincerely, Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:24:10 +0000 Subject: Free e-book: Windows 7 troubleshooting tips For Tech World: Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by robmar on 10/28/09
Anything free is good? so this e-book from Microsoft press looks something worthwhile for anyone trying to troubleshoot Windows 7 Microsoft Press : Free e-book: Windows 7 troubleshooting tips “Mitch Tulloch, a Microsoft Most Valuable Professional and lead author of the just-published (and hot-selling) Windows 7 Resource Kit (Microsoft Press, 2010; ISBN: 9780735627000; 1760 pages), has created a short e-book called “What You Can Do Before You Call Tech Support.” Here are the opening paragraphs:thanks to @MarkWilsonIT for the tip Rob Technorati Tags: Windows 7,Microsoft Press
Things you can do from here:
Windows 7: Simplify your PC. Learn more. 28 října Fw: Hands-on: Google Voice's new voice mail serviceFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 12:07 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Cc: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager
Subject: Hands-on: Google Voice's new voice mail
service Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via CNET News.com on 10/27/09 How to use Google Voice's visual voice mail service
without losing your personal mobile number.Things you can do from here:
Fw: Windows XP and Windows 7 Migration and CoexistenceFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 5:10 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Windows XP and Windows 7 Migration and
Coexistence Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology http://www.ceektechnology.com Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via TechNet Blogs by Keith Combs on
10/27/09
We often focus our attention on the enterprise tools, but I thought it made sense for this article to focus on a single machine upgrade using a consumer point of view. There are some things you can and can’t do, so I thought I’d go on a little adventure to see what the road to Windows 7 was like. Please note: I am not addressing most of the activation issues I see discussed on the internet. I did however research what we’ve publicly documented and published, and have provided several important references in this article. Gathering the Resources The first stop on my little adventure was the local OfficeMax. I stopped by the retail store to purchase Windows 7 Professional Upgrade. Yes, I actually spent real money and everything. I know this seems odd, but I like to run the same thing you do and I don’t have upgrade media and keys with my TechNet subscription (which I find odd). I decided to setup Windows XP on a fairly state-of-the-art laptop. The victim in this case was a Lenovo ThinkPad. I could have used my oldest laptop or desktop, but it didn’t seem to make sense to deal with the slower speeds of those machines. Windows 7 is already installed on my Dell Latitude D820. I might as well use something newer and faster for testing. I wanted to look at the issues associated with migrating to Windows 7 and using Windows Virtual PC XP Mode. So I constructed some scenarios in my mind and set out to test them. Some of my conclusions are probably wrong so I look forward to your feedback. Moving to 64 Bit Computing The version of Windows XP I installed was Professional but it was the 32 bit version. It’s been a pretty long time since I’ve run Windows XP and hit the usual first issue. I needed to grab the latest Intel SATA driver for my machines SATA AHCI mode and build a floppy disk for installation. Brings back old memories. Good old F6 at install time. Glad that feature is now history. The rest of the Windows XP install was easy enough. I installed the integrated version of Windows XP and SP3 so updating it after that wasn’t too bad. After I had the OS all ship shape, I proceeded to install a wide variety of applications and data. I installed some old apps like Dreamweaver 8, and some new applications like Office 2010. I installed some printers and copied my personal data. When it was all said and done, I had a nice little Windows XP machine with a smattering of applications, connected printers, and user data. The next step was of course to backup my work. You never know how many iterations of testing you might go through so taking “snapshots” of your work along the way is smart. In order to do that, I purchased Acronis True Image Home 2010. Man, I really like that product. Yes, I purchased it with my own money. I’ve used Ghost for years but I’m really liking the Acronis product now. So the question is, “Can I upgrade from Windows XP Pro x86 to Windows 7 Pro x64?” The answer is of course yes and no. To the best of my knowledge, we have never supported a cross architecture in-place upgrade (x86 –> x64). And it can’t be done with Windows 7. We also don’t support upgrading from Windows XP to Windows 7 even on the same architecture. So what do you do? Windows Easy Transfer (WET) Before we get to the meat of the upgrade/install process, you should consider how you plan to move personal preferences, documents, music, pictures, favorites, etc. Be sure to check out some of the steps the Windows Client team documented. In my case, I skipped some of the upgrade checks and downloaded the latest and greatest transfer tool. Head on over to http://windows.microsoft.com/windows-easy-transfer. There are 32 and 64 bit versions for Windows XP and Windows Vista. A word of warning here. The version for Windows XP only gathers and creates the .MIG file. In other words, you cannot use this tool to transfer this data into a Windows XP Mode virtual machine. It does however migrate data to Windows 7 VERY nicely. The user interface lets to pick and choose what to backup and restore at a very granular level. If you plan to migrate data from Windows XP to a XP Mode virtual machine, you must use the Windows XP Files and Settings Transfer Wizard. The problem with using this tool is that it is an all or nothing proposition. You cannot pick and choose what is restored. I have a better recommendation below for XP Mode use. When I did my Windows 7 Pro x64 Upgrade media install, I was offered two different choices by the setup program. They aren’t overt choices but they are there. The first is to install on the same disk and partition as the current installation of Windows XP. If you do this, Windows XP, all of the apps, and all of the user data will be moved to a subdirectory called windows.old. Keep in mind you are going to need a considerable amount of free disk space for all of this to occur. In my case I am using a 250GB laptop drive and the Windows XP install, apps and data are only consuming about 35GB. So I had plenty of available disk space. The end result is pretty interesting for a couple of reasons. First, grabbing your personal data from windows.old is fast and easy. You can easily move your docs, pictures, music, etc. via cut and paste. Since it’s all on the same drive, the move is nearly instant. No waiting around for a wizard to pull the data out of a proprietary file format. Second, when you delete windows.old you are left with nothing but Windows 7 and and personal data you decided to grab. This is effectively a clean install at that point and because you did this in the supported way we expect, you should not hit any issues with the upgrade key activation. I highly recommend using the windows.old method of custom installation because this seems to be the safe and effective approach. You still have to install your desired applications into Windows 7, but look at the bright side. You are starting off with a nice clean system and you can carefully evaluate which applications you really need. We’ll talk about some application compatibility issues in a minute. The other choice when using the Custom Installation option is to wipe the hard drive. This involves formatting the drive and is obviously a destructive process. You had better make sure you have working backups and copies of your data before going down this path. See this article for the proper procedure. See the Windows 7 Troubleshooting and Help area for other topics. And by all means contact our support organization if you managed to get painted into a corner and need help.
An amazing number of tools and articles have already been written about how to move applications from Windows XP to Windows Vista and now Windows 7. I am not going to go into all of that here because the topic is large and has already been covered in detail. I would however like to mention something new. We added some new capabilities to Windows 7 via a free download called Windows Virtual PC. Windows Virtual PC lets you run a special Windows XP virtual machine that is tightly integrated with the Windows 7 desktop. XP Mode will run a couple of ways. As you can see at right, you can run the virtual machine windowed on the Windows 7 desktop. You can also run applications that are executing in the vm but appear as if they are running native to the Windows 7 desktop. When I first installed the XP Mode vm, I intended to use the Windows Easy Transfer wizard to migrate some settings from the original Windows XP environment of the physical machine to the virtual machine. I learned the hard way this is not possible. Thank heavens for taking backup snapshots along the way. I then tried to use the Files and Settings Transfer Wizard but that wasn’t an ideal solution either. It wanted to dump everything into the virtual machine and that IS NOT the intention of the vm. Windows Virtual PC and XP Mode are intended to provide that last resort capability for one or two applications that simply won’t run otherwise. It is not intended to be your production environment. Therefore you should not need to use WET or the Files and Settings Transfer Wizard to migrate data to the XP Mode vm. Use it for the one or two apps you require, but use Windows 7 for everything else. Dual Boot You can of course dual boot Windows 7 with another operating system. This is also referred to as multiboot. There are a number of methods to doing this and just for fun I decided to create a multiboot environment where Windows XP is on the original disk partition with Windows 7. As you might have guessed, I installed Windows 7 using a native-boot VHD thus creating a multiboot environment. That worked but keep in mind this is totally an unsupported configuration. Let me repeat that. As far as I can tell, we do not support a multiboot environment where Windows 7 is deployed like this. If you want to learn how to do this, see the references below. Summary Moving from Windows XP to Windows 7 can be very easy. I realize I only touched lightly on the application compatibility topic, but as I mentioned above, there are many articles on how to solve app compat issues. Many of those issues have already been solved by our partners and independent software developers. As you can see above, there are a number of approaches to migrating or coexisting with Windows 7 and Windows XP. I only looked at a single machine over the course of a couple of days. For those of you supporting multiple machines, we do of course have a strong set of tools to help you assess your environment, automate the upgrades, and deploy Windows 7. I’ll be writing more about the enterprise tools, but I thought you might enjoy the consumer tasks and tools first. Screencasts I actually recorded several screencasts during the research for this blog post. In the end, I decided not to publish them. The primary reason is because I felt the tools and techniques are pretty easy to understand. That and my flabber was gasted when I learned the WET tool could not be used in the XP Mode virtual machine. At that point it became apparent I had the wrong approach to XP Mode and simplified the tasks you might consider. Feedback is welcome. Other Information and References
Things you can do from here:
27 října Fw: No, OEM Microsoft Windows licenses cannot be transferred to another PCFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 3:49 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: No, OEM Microsoft Windows licenses cannot be transferred to
another PC For your information. Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by mssmallbiz on
10/27/09
Earlier today I put up the , “Regardless of what any hack says, a Windows 7 Upgrade is an Upgrade. What you need to know,” post here on my Blog and shortly afterwards I received the following question offline: “If I have an old PC with an OEM Windows license on it, can I just take that Windows license from that PC and us it to qualify for the Windows 7 upgrade?” Transfer rights and OEM software are two topic that have been discussed here on the Blog quite a bit over the years, so I thought I would put this post together to directly address this question on OEM Windows licenses and transferability. Bottom line is, no, OEM Microsoft Windows licenses do not have any transfer rights and live and die on the original computer they are shipped with and installed on, period. Here’s a visual representation for you:
As you can see, the OEM Windows license is “locked” to the original PC it comes with and cannot be transferred to any other PC. So in this instance, the new PC would require a full Windows license, not an upgrade license in order to be licensed to run Microsoft Windows. Here are some other posts I have put up in the past that may be helpful for you in terms of understanding transfer rights and OEM software:
Thank you and have a wonderful day, Eric
Ligman – Follow me on
TWITTER Bookmark on: MSDN , TechNet, and Expression Technorati
Tags: Microsoft,OEM,Windows,Windows 7,licensing,license,software,SA,Software
Assurance,transfer,refurbish,office,server,Eric
Ligman del.icio.us
Tags: Microsoft,OEM,Windows,Windows 7,licensing,license,software,SA,Software
Assurance,transfer,refurbish,office,server,Eric
Ligman Things you can do from here:
Fw: Regardless of what any hack says, a Windows 7 Upgrade is an Upgrade. What yo...From: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:35 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Regardless of what any hack says, a Windows 7 Upgrade is an
Upgrade. What yo... Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by mssmallbiz on
10/27/09
First, the feedback, excitement, etc. we’ve been seeing since the launch of Windows 7 last week has been phenomenal! Thank you to all of you for providing your feedback to us to let us know how your Windows 7 experience is going. Unfortunately, it looks like it is time to have this conversation again though. Over the past several days there have been various posts, etc. across a variety of social media engines stating that some “hack” (be it a person or a procedure) shows that a Windows 7 Upgrade disc can perform a “clean” installation of Windows 7 on a blank drive from a technical perspective. Of course, from the posts I saw, they often forgot to mention a very basic, yet very important piece of information… “Technically possible” does not always mean legal. Let me explain what I mean: Here are some very basic facts:
To put it simply, here is a graphical representation of what this means:
In stark contrast to:
So when these posts and write-ups state that you can install clean from an Upgrade piece of software and they fail to mention that you need to own a qualifying software license to be legal to use the Upgrade software for the installation, they give the impression that because it is technically possible, it is legal to do. Unfortunately, by doing this, they irresponsibly put end users at risk of loading unlicensed software. Because of this, I am putting this post up to try and clarify the truth behind what an upgrade license is and provides so that hopefully people will not find themselves misled by some of these other posts and articles that may mislead them to believe something that is very wrong due to their lack of inclusion of this important piece of information. If the posts or write-ups you saw did include this information, then kudos to that writer for providing the accurate information. Now there are many, many, many, many of you out there that already own Windows licenses that qualify for the Windows 7 Upgrade, so this is a non-issue for you. For those of you without an existing Windows license to upgrade from, you should be aware that an Upgrade license by itself is not a license to install and run Windows on your computer. In order to upgrade, you need to have a qualifying license to upgrade from. Again, that’s why it is called an “upgrade.” For you, Windows 7 is available pre-installed on PCs around the world today, or you can purchase a full Windows license from one of the many Microsoft Partners we have, or you can download it today. You might also want to check out some of the great “7 days of Windows 7 deals” going on right now, such as the “PC home makeover” offer that gets you a laptop, a netbook, and a desktop PC (all three with Windows 7 installed), plus a monitor, and wireless router, all for just $1,199! I hope this helps clear up any confusion over what an “Upgrade” really is and is not and who qualifies to install and use an upgrade license in their move to Windows 7. Thank you and have a wonderful day, Eric
Ligman – Follow me on
TWITTER Bookmark on: MSDN , TechNet, and Expression Technorati
Tags: Microsoft,Windows 7,Windows,upgrade,software,license,EULA,install,hack,Windows XP,Eric Ligman,download,Partners,MPN,Microsoft
Partner Network del.icio.us
Tags: Microsoft,Windows 7,Windows,upgrade,software,license,EULA,install,hack,Windows XP,Eric Ligman,download,Partners,MPN,Microsoft
Partner Network Things you can do from here:
Fw: Introducing Orator for BlackBerry Smartphones
Intorducing Orator for BlackBerry® Smartphones
From: HumanWare
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:57 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Introducing Orator for BlackBerry
Smartphones
Fw: Windows XP mode for Windows 7! FREE Download hereFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:27 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Cc: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager
Subject: Windows XP mode for Windows 7! FREE Download
here Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via TechNet Blogs by johnfer on
10/27/09
The announcement of Windows XP mode caused a lot of excitement, in this
screen cast we have a look at how it is setup up, what users see and get an idea
of what it can do. Things you can do from here:
Fw: Download Windows Help program (WinHlp32.exe) for Windows 7From: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 7:41 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Cc: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager
Subject: Download Windows Help program (WinHlp32.exe) for Windows
7 Christopher McMillan, CIO Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by robmar on
10/27/09
If you want to be able to display and read the Windows help files, those that have a .hlp extension then you will need to install Download details: WinHlp32.exe for Windows 7.
Of course this doesn't me there isn’t help within Windows 7, just press F1 at any time to get the latest help, or visit Windows.microsoft.com to see the latest help online. There is also a version for Windows Server 2008 R2 Rob Technorati
Tags: Windows 7
Things you can do from here:
Fw: PLEASE Dont put HUB or CAS in the Perimeter Network!!From: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 9:43 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: PLEASE Dont put HUB or CAS in the Perimeter
Network!! For your information. Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via TechNet Blogs by johnfer on
10/27/09
This is a GREAT post from the team over at EHLO about the dangers of a bad design decision; We sometimes hear customers talking about putting Exchange 2007 or Exchange 2010 Client Access Servers (CAS) into the Perimeter network (sometimes referred to as the "DMZ" - Demilitarized Zone). A Perimeter network is a network zone many companies deploy between the Internet and their intranet as defense-in-depth. The idea behind a perimeter network is to add additional steps to what a hacker would have to do to get access to any intranet resources. To add as strong defense-in-depth as possible, you want to put only servers you trust to withstand Internet attacks in the perimeter, and then you should assume they can be broken into anyway. With Exchange 2000/2003, it was supported and there was documentation explaining how to put an Exchange 2000/2003 Front-End (FE) server into the perimeter network, with a firewall between the FE and the Exchange Back-End (BE) servers it accessed. This leads some customers who upgrade from E2000/E2003 to expect the same deployment pattern with E2007/E2010. As you start planning for deploying an E2007/E2010 CAS server in the perimeter network, you quickly notice that there is no documentation for how to do this though. You will probably even find the TechNet documentation which explains this is explicitly not supported by Microsoft. Microsoft doesn't test or support any topologies which put firewalls between a CAS and a Mailbox (MBX) server. The only Exchange 2007/2010 role which is supported for deployment in a perimeter network, and with a firewall server separating it from other Exchange server it talks to, is the Edge role. This is true for Exchange servers talking to one another within and between AD Sites. The fact that there is no support for using firewalls between Exchange servers (except for the Edge role) sometimes causes confusion for how to use the Windows OS firewall on Exchange. It is supported to have the Windows OS firewall turned on for Exchange servers. In fact, we strongly recommend you leave the Windows OS firewall turned on as a defense-in-depth measure. Exchange 2010 setup is smart enough to configure the Windows OS firewall so it'll let through all Exchange traffic appropriately (for Exchange 2007 you need to run the Security Configuration Wizard and apply the Exchange 2007 role based template). When discussing the fact that it is not supported to put CAS in the perimeter network, the next question is obviously "why?". If this was supported and documented for E2000/E2003 FE, why not for E2007/E2010 CAS? The most important reason why customers wanted to install Exchange FE servers in the perimeter network was to block any unauthenticated traffic from reaching servers on the intranet. This is a good practice, but as you'll see below doing this with Exchange FE/CAS servers is no longer the best way to accomplish this goal. It is important to understand that the CAS role in Exchange 2007 is significantly different from the FE server in E2000/E2003. · The E2000/E2003 FE servers were there to authenticate users and proxy traffic to the BE server where the traffic was actually interpreted and responded to. For example, the FE servers in E2000/E2003 don't do any Outlook Web Access (OWA) rendering. That all takes place on the BE servers. · The E2007/E2010 CAS role on the other hand contains all middle-tier logic and rendering code for processes like OWA, Exchange ActiveSync (EAS), Exchange Web Services (EWS), and more. In the same timeframe as E2007 was available, enough customers had also started using reverse proxies (e.g. Internet Security and Acceleration server (ISA) 2000 FP1, 2004 or 2006) with functionality like pre-authentication. This meant there was now a good way to do authentication of Exchange traffic before the traffic reached the Exchange servers. The role the E2000/E2003 FE server had played for defense-in-depth by pre-authenticating traffic before it reached servers which included a lot of Exchange business logic could now be better handled by these new reverse proxies. The reasons a reverse proxy like this does a better job than an Exchange FE or CAS server for this defense-in-depth role are: · Exchange CAS servers require full access to all mailboxes in an AD Site, and significant access rights to the AD. That's a level of access privileged which you should avoid having in the perimeter network. · The Exchange FE executed a little bit of Exchange business logic, and the Exchange CAS executes a lot of Exchange business logic. The more business logic you expose in the perimeter network, the more risk you're taking that something in that logic can be hacked. For servers you put in the perimeter network, you want to minimize the logic/code surface area they run and which is exposed to attack from the outside. Reverse Proxies are built with the primary purpose of withstanding Internet attacks like that. Although Exchange servers are also hardened from a security perspective, they run much more logic than a reverse proxy, which increases the risk. · Reverse Proxies are built to be put in the perimeter network or at the edge of the network. They include many security features and flexibility for customers to determine the level of defense-in-depth which is right in any particular environment. Some of these defense-in-depth features are easy to just turn on (e.g. using pre-authentication while your reverse proxy is an AD domain member; or avoiding AD domain membership and limiting pre-authentication capabilities) whereas other defense-in-depth features take more work (e.g. using pre-authentication without domain membership by using RADIUS). But the important distinction between the reverse proxies and the CAS is that the reverse proxies have many more defense-in-depth features and deployment models available than Exchange CAS. In addition to these reasons why a reverse proxy does a better job in the perimeter network than an Exchange FE/CAS does, there is also a problem with FE/CAS in the perimeter which goes away when using a reverse proxy there instead: · Deploying an E2000/E2003 FE server in the Perimeter network was difficult.
The port settings and other internal firewall configuration required was
complicated and many customers ran into problems setting this up correctly.
Different types of internal firewalls required different configuration and the
symptoms experienced by Internet clients when something was misconfigured
weren't always easy to diagnose. This complexity and the errors it caused was a
problem for Exchange customers. The internal firewall configuration required
when using a reverse proxy in the perimeter is much simpler. This is why we
don't offer "CAS in the perimeter network" as a supported solution even for
customers who want to take the security risks listed above: people accidentally
end up shooting themselves in the foot when trying to configure things for a
FE/CAS to work in a perimeter network. The best way to deploy Exchange CAS with respect to a perimeter network is to
put a reverse proxy you trust in the perimeter, configure the firewall between
the perimeter and the intranet to be as restrictive as possible and to host the
CAS server on the intranet. This will get traffic inspection and other reverse
proxy security filtering in place in the perimeter. Things you can do from here:
Fw: Channel 10 - Microsoft's Official USB/DVD Download Tool Helps you Upgrade Ne...From: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 9:35 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Channel 10 - Microsoft's Official USB/DVD Download Tool
Helps you Upgrade Ne... Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by Brianjo on
10/27/09
I haven’t tried this yet, but I’m pretty happy to see it up there. The help file is available on the Microsoft Store site here.
Things you can do from here:
Fw: Google Voice Can Now Take Control Of Your Mobile VoicemailFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:30 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Google Voice Can Now Take Control Of Your Mobile
Voicemail Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via TechCrunch by Michael Arrington on
10/26/09
I solved the problem by simply porting my mobile number away from AT&T over to Google Voice, a feature that Google says will be launched more broadly eventually. Others solve the problem via the Google Voice application on various phones. But even then, if someone calls your old mobile number and leaves a message, you have to deal with it separately. Not any more. Tonight Google is launching a third option, a new feature that allows mobile users to move their voicemail away from their carrier and over to Google Voice. The benefits: your mobile voicemails go into your Google Voice inbox along with other voicemails and text messages, plus you can create custom greetings for callers and your voicemails are all automatically transcribed (sometimes hilariously). There are a few steps that have to be completed that vary based on the carrier and phone that you use. But if you are really trying to move over to Google Voice, it’s worth it. When it’s all set up, voicemail messages from people who call your mobile number (not your Google Voice number) will be taken over by Google Voice. That makes them much easier to listen to, or read. And yes, it even works on the iPhone.
Crunch Network: CrunchBase the free database of technology companies, people, and investors
Things you can do from here:
Fw: Office Web ApplicationsFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:43 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Cc: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager
Subject: Office Web Applications Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via TechNet Blogs by Vedant
Kulshreshtha on 10/26/09
Office Web Applications is a new web based productivity offering in Microsoft Office 2010 suite. You can watch the demo here: Demo of the Office Web Apps Office Web Apps services include companions to Microsoft Word 2010, Microsoft Excel 2010, Microsoft PowerPoint 2010, and Microsoft OneNote 2010. These would be available on Windows Live at no cost to users as an ad-supported service (read: Office Web Apps Coming to Windows Live). For enterprise users, it can be hosted on SharePoint 2010 (SharePoint Foundation 2010 or the SharePoint Server 2010) either on-premise or online. Office Web Applications are licensed with Office 2010 and need to be installed and enabled on top of SharePoint 2010. These applications are focused on offering access to Word 2010, PowerPoint 2010, Excel 2010, and OneNote 2010 documents through any browser across multiple platforms, lightweight creation and editing capabilities in standard formats. When enabled, it enhances experience of SharePoint user. For example,
Browsers Supported
Read The Office Web Apps Love Your Browser for more details. Silverlight integration Office Web Applications works whether or not Silverlight is installed on the machine. With Silverlight, the user experience gets better. For example:
Read Under the Hood: Find in the Word Web App Viewer and The Office Web Apps Love Your Browser posts for more details. Deploying Office Web Applications Refer the Deploy Office Web Apps document available on the Microsoft Download Center. Deploying Office Web Apps involves three primary phases:
PowerPoint Broadcast Slide Show feature The functionality provided by the PowerPoint Web Application, also enables the PowerPoint Broadcast Slide Show feature. This is a new feature in Microsoft Office 2010 that enables presenters to broadcast a slide show from PowerPoint 2010 to remote viewers who watch in a Web browser. Broadcast Slide Show gives organizations options to provide broadcast slideshow services to users either as an internally-hosted service or as a service accessed over the Internet. Broadcast Slide Show and Microsoft Live Meeting are complementary technologies, each providing a different level of functionality and end-user experience.
To learn more about deploying Broadcast Slide Show, refer to the Deploying Broadcast Slide Show document. Things you can do from here:
26 října FW: Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 eBooksDear Blog Site
Sincerely, From: Chris McMillan,
Federal Marketing Manager [mailto:chrismmcmillan@gmail.com]
For Your Information
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via MSDN Blogs by nickmac on 10/26/09
Hi All, Your may be interested in the following free Windows eBooks: Deploying Windows® 7 Essential Guidance from the Windows 7 Resource Kit and TechNet Magazine Download the New eBook: Deploying Windows® 7 Essential Guidance from the Windows 7 Resource Kit and Microsoft® TechNet Magazine. Looking for guidance specific to Windows 7 deployment? Check out what the industry's leading experts have to say in this free Microsoft Press eBook with selected chapters from the Windows 7 Resource Kit on Deployment Platforms, Planning, Testing Application Compatibility. Introducing Windows Server 2008 R2 eBook Introducing Windows Server 2008 R2 is a deep-dive e-book, that will get you up to speed on how R2's new features and capabilities work, including Hyper-V and RDS virtualization, management, IIS and the new Web application platform and, of course, all the synergistic goodness between Windows Server and Windows 7. Free for a click, so don't miss out. Nick
Things you can do from here:
FW: Public Firefox 3.6 beta now expected Wednesday, 3.5.4 TuesdayDear Blog Site
Sincerely, From: Chris McMillan,
Federal Marketing Manager [mailto:chrismmcmillan@gmail.com]
For Your Information!!
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via Betanews by Scott M. Fulton, III on 10/26/09
By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews
The first public beta of Firefox 3.6, which adds even more Windows 7 integration, will be released the following day. It will probably not be the final public beta for the product, as a development cycle for Beta 2 has been ongoing since the Beta 1 code was frozen last October 14. As Betanews reported before, our tests show Firefox 3.6 speed gains to be sizable on all platforms, now pulling the venerable browser to within the performance levels of version 2 of Google Chrome (although version 3 is the current stable edition, and version 4 is its widely distributed dev channel build). However, we also expected to see the final public build ten days ago -- its released was blocked on account of newly discovered bugs. Some sources had reported the product was actually released, and a few went on to say it was released and then retracted; data obtained by Betanews from Mozilla indicates this was never the case. Tomorrow's rollout of the stable version bug fix means the window for the next bug fix in that cycle moves to mid-December, which is not the most desirable timeframe. During today's planning meeting, contributors called for suggestions as to how or whether that timeframe could be adjusted.
Things you can do from here:
FW: 27 Takes on Windows 7Dear Blog Site:
Sincerely, From: Chris McMillan,
Federal Marketing Manager [mailto:chrismmcmillan@gmail.com]
Dear Tech List:
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via MSDN Blogs by Joey deVilla on 10/26/09
If you’ve got customers wondering if they should upgrade from Windows XP or Vista to Windows 7 and are looking for testimonials, go to Gizmodo’s article, 27 Takes on Windows 7. It features quotes from 27 reviews of Windows 7, which include the following seven:
[This article also appears in Global Nerdy.]
Things you can do from here:
FW: Roadmap for Outlook Personal Folders (.pst) DocumentationDear Blog Site:
Sincerely, From: Chris McMillan,
Federal Marketing Manager [mailto:chrismmcmillan@gmail.com]
Well this is going to
take some time to understand.
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via MSDN Blogs by jccim on 10/26/09
By Paul Lorimer, Group Manager, Microsoft Office InteroperabilityData portability has become an increasing need for our customers and partners as more information is stored and shared in digital formats. One scenario that has come up recently is how to further improve platform-independent access to email, calendar, contacts, and other data generated by Microsoft Outlook. On desktops, this data is stored in Outlook Personal Folders, in a format called a .pst file. Developers can already access the data stored in the .pst file, using Messaging API (MAPI) and the Outlook Object Model—a rich set of connections to all of the data stored by Outlook and Exchange Server—but only if Outlook is installed on the desktop. In order to facilitate interoperability and enable customers and vendors to access the data in .pst files on a variety of platforms, we will be releasing documentation for the .pst file format. This will allow developers to read, create, and interoperate with the data in .pst files in server and client scenarios using the programming language and platform of their choice. The technical documentation will detail how the data is stored, along with guidance for accessing that data from other software applications. It also will highlight the structure of the .pst file, provide details like how to navigate the folder hierarchy, and explain how to access the individual data objects and properties. This documentation is still in its early stages and work is ongoing. We are engaging directly with industry experts and interested customers to gather feedback on the quality of the technical documentation to ensure that it is clear and useful. When it is complete, it will be released under our Open Specification Promise, which will allow anyone to implement the .pst file format on any platform and in any tool, without concerns about patents, and without the need to contact Microsoft in any way. Designing our high volume products to enable such data portability is a key commitment under our Interoperability Principles, which we announced in early 2008. We support this commitment through our product features, documented formats, and implementation of standards. The move to open up the portability of data in .pst files is another step in putting these principles in action. Over the past year, Microsoft Office has taken several steps toward increased openness and document interoperability. We’re proud of the work we’ve done around document interoperability, offering customers a choice of file formats and embracing a comprehensive approach that includes transparency into our engineering methods, collaboration with industry stakeholders, and shared stewardship of industry standards. We’re excited about the possibilities created for our customers and partners by this kind of effort, and we look forward to continued collaboration with the industry in our pursuit of improved interoperability with Microsoft Office. Stay tuned. Paul Lorimer, Group Manager, Microsoft Office Interoperability. Related Items:
Things you can do from here:
Fw: Window-Eyes Script Writing Class in MinneapolisFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:12 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Window-Eyes Script Writing Class in
Minneapolis For your information! Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via GW Micro -
Upcoming Events RSS Feed on 4/13/10 GW Micro
and HandyTech North America are proud to bring you another exciting opportunity
to learn how to write scripts....Things you can do from here:
Fw: Duet Client Installation Fails Due to .NET Installation/Upgrade FailureFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:31 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Duet Client Installation Fails Due to .NET
Installation/Upgrade Failure Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology http://www.ceektechnology.com Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by rsheriff on
10/26/09
Problem:Attempting to install the Duet Client results in the following .NET installation Error in the %temp%\dd_dotnetfx20error.txt log file “Error: Installation failed for component Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0a. MSI returned error code 1603”
Cause:The .NET framework installation has gotten into an unmanageable state (e.g. can’t be upgraded, repaired and/or uninstalled)
Resolution:You will need to resolve this before continuing the duet installation. Please use the “.NET Framework Cleanup Tool” to cleanup the previous .NET installation. The tool along with detailed instruction on using it can be found at the following blog post. http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/pages/8904493.aspx Things you can do from here:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|