| Christopher's profileCEEK Technology AT and M...BlogListsNetwork | Help |
CEEK Technology AT and Mainstream Product NewsAssistive Product News and RSS Updates TOP AT FAQ"S and Product News
Latest News From the AT Industry
|
November 10 FW: Get your FREE Exchange 2010 Virtual Labs HERE!!
Dear Blog Site:
Sincerely, Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:32:51 +0000 Subject: Get your FREE Exchange 2010 Virtual Labs HERE!! For Your Information Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via TechNet Blogs by johnfer on 11/10/09
Yesterday at TechEd Berlin we announced that Exchange Server 2010 has shipped! Learn more about Exchange 2010 at the Exchange website, Watch a Web Cast or do a Virtual Lab. Exchange Server is also a part of our New Efficiency Virtual LaunchTo read what others has to say, check of our News and Reviews ![]() Things you can do from here:
Windows 7: Unclutter your desktop. Learn more. FW: Kindle for PC Now Available
Dear Blog Site
Sincerely,
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:34:59 +0000 Subject: Kindle for PC Now Available Well let's see where this goes. Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via SuperSite Blog by pthurrott on 11/10/09
Amazon:Amazon.com today announced the availability of "Kindle for PC," the free application that lets readers around the world enjoy Kindle books on their personal computers (PC). The U.S. Kindle Store currently offers more than 360,000 books, including New Releases and 101 of 112 New York Times Bestsellers, which are typically $9.99 or less. The Kindle Store is the only place to find some of today’s most popular books in digital format. Kindle books can now be read on the Kindle, Kindle DX, iPhone, iPod touch and PC. Kindle for PC is now available as a free download to readers in over 100 countries at www.amazon.com/KindleforPC. Things you can do from here:
Find the right PC with Windows 7 and Windows Live. Learn more. FW: 12 tips to secure your Windows System (Win7 & 2008 R2)
Dear Blog SIte
Sincerely, Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:36:26 +0000 Subject: 12 tips to secure your Windows System (Win7 & 2008 R2) For IT Community Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by StevenM on 11/10/09
Live from Berlin at Tech.ed 2009 your Swiss Microsoft Student Partners (MSPs) are here to blog about the conference and the sessions we joined. In this session (12 tips to secure your Windows System (Win7 & 2008 R2), Mark Minasi is here to give us some tips about security and new goodies in Win7. First Mark started by telling us some general problems about security. There are 2 categories of security holes: the silicium base and the carbon based (human). It is important to differentiate both of them because software will never correct carbon based problem, but it can always help! He then mentioned that the security policies are always getting better but not the users. And that a first step to get good security is to be able to convince the user to follow the rules. You must talk to your management, once they are on board with your security policy, it is a half win. Then you must be persuasive with your users and make them sign the policies (you can even threaten them with punishment if needed). Mark continued with some math: you can reaches asymptotically 100% security as money invested reaches infinity, therefore IT security has a price and we need to accept a risk (the same way when we take the car). He then explained that the purpose of an IT guy would be to increase ease of access to resource and the purpose of a security guy would be to keep people access to resources. Password was a big topic in the presentation, he explained how crucial point it is for security and that "bad passwords always beat good security". The evolution of password has changed a lot in the last 20 years. Whereas in old times 4 characters were good enough password, now a minimum would be 8 and a good one should have 12 characters (and become a passphrase) that are always transmitted in the form of a 128 bit hash function. The problem is that complex password is hard to guess but hard to remember too! And if we continue following Moore's law in 10 years the passphrase would be minimum 20 characters long. Finally a user won't be able to remember his password (especially if he needs to change it every 45 days), so the solution would be to use a smartcard (1000 to 4000 bit actually). One other major problem is that many applications we use require admin right to run (generally because there are poorly written) and here is where UAC (User Access Control) comes in. With UAC you always login as standard user and when you need to become an admin you can just switch to have all the rights (previously you needed to logoff as a user, login as an admin, do your stuff, logoff as admin and re-login as user). At the end he told us about services security issues. As almost all of them have to be run from system account, they have lots of rights and can do a lot of things, which make them first choice targets for worms who could then enjoy total system rights. Windows 7 provides more regulations tools for developers: there are now 34 subset privileges in the system account, which can be activated or inactivated independently by the developer. To check if a developer has done a correct job, use the command "sc qprivs servicename". Developers can now edit the rights of services with a laser precision, avoiding putting the whole system in danger if one of the services is hacked by a worm. The first day of the conference was very nice and we look forward for the next days. That was Steven Meyer and Mikhail Chatillon, for Microsoft Switzerland, direct from Berlin Things you can do from here:
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. FW: Oct. 27 - Nov. 9 Hot-Fix KB articles Weekly Release - Windows 6/7Dear Blog Site: Sincerely,
Sent: Tuesday, November
10, 2009 2:22 AM
For IT Community
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via TechNet Blogs by Content Team on 11/9/09
Things you can do from here:
![]() Intel Makes An E-Reader for the Visually ImpairedIntel Makes an E-reader for the Visually Impaired Intel has created a mobile device called Intel Reader. It scans print and then reads it out loud. Robert McMillan, IDG News Service Monday, November 09, 2009 09:20 PM PST On Tuesday, Intel will start selling a nifty new e-reader that can snap pictures of books and newspapers and then read them back to people who have a hard time reading the printed page. Called the Intel Reader, the US$1,499 device assists people who are blind, dyslexic or have weak vision, said Ben Foss, the director of access technology with Intel's Digital Health Group, who came up with the idea for the reader. "It's designed to give them independence and access to reading." Intel estimates that there are as many as 55 million people in the U.S. who could use its device. Foss says that the Reader will give many of them a new freedom to read books, magazines and newspapers that would otherwise be inaccessible. Users simply hold the Reader a few feet above the paper they want to read; it snaps a photo, and within seconds converts the page to text, which it can then display in a large font or read out loud. "We're excited by this and we think it will really make a difference for millions of people with disabilities," said James Wendorf, executive director of the National Center for Learning Disabilities, speaking at a Monday press conference where the device was unveiled. Sold by resellers such as CTL, Howard Technology Solutions and HumanWare, the paperback-sized device combines a 5-megapixel camera with a Linux-powered, optical character-recognition system and software that converts text into the spoken word. With 2GB of storage, it can store about 600 snapshots of scanned pages -- at two pages per snapshot that would represent a 1,200-page paperback novel. The device can play back scanned items, but it also supports MP3s, WAV files, text files and the DAISY (Digital Accessible Information System) format, used to publish books for people with reading problems. The battery can power about four hours of playback between charges. The reader has a special user interface designed for people who have a hard time reading, and it can play back audio at varying speeds. Foss likes to hear playback at the almost comically high-pitched speed of 200 words per minutes, which he likens to speed-reading. Intel also makes a briefcase-sized docking station that can hold and power the reader while it's being used to scan a large number of pages. The company will introduce a U.K. version of the Reader in a few days and plans to roll it out in other countries as well, Foss said. The device represents a sleeker alternative to more cumbersome reading aides such as text magnifiers, which cost around $3,000 each, and Braille readers, which can cost between $7,000 and $10,000, Foss said. With Amazon's Kindle, the e-reader market has taken off in recent years, but until now, nobody has built one for people with diminished eyesight that can scan and replay anything on paper, said Dorrie Rush, director of marketing with Lighthouse International, a nonprofit group that helps people suffering from vision loss. Rush, who has lost vision because of an eye disorder called Stargardt's disease, can barely read the headlines from the New York Times while holding the paper about 4 inches from her face. She has tried out Intel's device and she loves it. "Intel has really done their homework and created something that does good and looks good." Intel's Foss has a personal connection to the project. Diagnosed with dyslexia in elementary school, he spent hours during his college years faxing papers to his mother, who would then read them back to him over the phone. Now he hopes that the device he helped create will help other students in his shoes. "Ultimately we're trying to give people access to hope and to self-respect."
1998-2009, PC World Communications, Inc.
Sincerely,
![]() FW: Firefox turns five: Thanks for giving us a choiceDear Blog Site: Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 6:05 PM
Here Here BetaNews. I could not
agree more. Now if only Chrome was able to work with technology for the Blind.
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via Betanews by Carmi Levy on 11/9/09
By Carmi Levy, Betanews Birthdays in the world of tech normally aren't that big of a deal for most folks. We tend to feel as much nostalgia toward hardware, software and services as we do toward flu shots and oil changes for the car. But even if you don't use Firefox -- and by the numbers, that's over 60% of you -- it's difficult to underestimate this once-upstart browser's impact on the way we experience the Internet, and how our software is developed in the first place. Replacing monopoly with choice Before Firefox came along, Internet browsing was Microsoft's game to lose. The company had successfully used its ability to bake IE into the fabric of its dominant operating system, to none-too-subtly force mainstream internauts to overlook the alternative. If IE was already sitting on the average user's desktop, the logic went, why would he or she even bother to download Netscape? The strategy worked, as Netscape began a long, slow slide into oblivion. Users by the millions simply stuck with what their OS came with. I'm keenly aware of the fact that Betanews readers can download and install a browser in the time it takes to change the channel. Yet I'm also keenly aware that our tech savvy readers are far outnumbered by the kind of Internet users who, for a while anyway, didn't understand what a browser was, and who thought "The Internet" was the glowing IE icon on their desktop.
The shift toward download-your-own But getting and keeping a monopoly are two entirely different things. As Microsoft eventually learned, product innovation matters, and its inability to focus on that growing market need left the door slightly open for an alternative. By failing to move the bar once it wrested control, Microsoft virtually guaranteed that increasingly sophisticated and demanding mainstream users -- who by then had figured out how to customize their desktops with their own software choices -- would eventually take the time to download and install a new browser. By 2004, there were enough of them who were ticked off with IE's dominant market position, its bloat, its disrespect for the Web standards of the day, and its sock-it-to-me reputation as a target for hackers that IE's days as the default choice were numbered. It's easy to forget that Firefox wasn't always a flexible upstart. It was born out of the ashes of Netscape's Mozilla Project, a bloated failure that stands as an example of too many features and not enough thought devoted toward making them work with each other...or for the end user. The project's rebirth under the Mozilla Foundation as a broad-scale open source collaboration allowed it to return focus to the singular browser. It also gave it the edge needed to position itself as a viable alternative to the then-dominant IE. Firefox introduced a number of features that we now take for granted: Tabbed browsing, add-ons and extensions, integrated search, themes, consistent support for Web standards, download management, pop-up blocking, and best of all, speed. And while age has helped more recent competitors like Google's Chrome begin the process of turning yesterday's David into today's Goliath, Firefox remains a formidable platform with enough developer and end-user support to ensure it won't soon meet Netscape's fate. Of course, nothing is a given in the world of tech. And despite its vaunted success in hacking out a growing base of fans (over 24% of all users, according to October 2009 data from NetApplications) and taking on a company many saw at the time as unbeatable, Firefox the browser isn't immune to the creeping ailments of age. It's gotten bigger and slower with each successive generation, and its prodigious use of memory and system resources remains a widespread source of irritation. But as the first truly successful example of an open source product that went mainstream, Firefox has helped build the business model by which software that's given away for free can become the basis of an industry. An intensifying market As version 3.6 gets set to go gold, the core developers are already filling in the blanks on a roadmap that stretches years into the future. Google, which was an early and ongoing Firefox supporter, now wants its own piece of the action as it aggressively improves Google Chrome and uses the browser as the basis for its first full-blown desktop operating system, Google Chrome OS. The broader client market is evolving as well, as the desktops that defined the bulk of our online activities in 2004 give way to increasingly mobile form factors and uses. Firefox's mobile project, known as Fennec, is expected to deliver a working product in 2010. None of this would have happened without Firefox 1.0. No one quite knows where any of this will end up. And whatever features and performance the various players pile in to their respective offerings in the coming months and years, they'll all owe a debt of gratitude to a product...more accurately, to an open source project that saw the potential in shifting the market away from dominant offerings from commercial players that limited choice and stifled development. In that respect, Firefox was less a product than a revolution in how software is developed and used, and how sustainable markets are built around these products. I can't wait to see what the next five years have in store. Carmi Levy is a Canadian-based independent technology analyst and journalist still trying to live down his past life leading help desks and managing projects for large financial services organizations. He comments extensively in a wide range of media, and works closely with clients to help them leverage technology and social media tools and processes to drive their business.
Things you can do from here:
![]() FW: OffiSync Premium Lets Microsoft Office Play Nice With Google SitesDear Blog Site: Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 6:08 PM
Well lets see how well this
works.
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via TechCrunch by Jason Kincaid on 11/9/09
We’ve been tracking OffiSync’s progress for a while now: last May the startup launched support for Google Docs, and released an improved version over the summer that integrated Google Image Search. But until now they haven’t had a premium option that was tailored for business. Founder Oudi Antebi, who was a Product Manager at Microsoft for both Office and SharePoint, says that up until now using Office with Google sites has been a clumsy process that required users to manually upload their modified documents from their desktops (conversely, SharePoint syncs the documents automatically). He says that ever since OffiSync launched, the company has been working toward bringing the product to the enterprise market, in the hopes of helping turn Google Sites into a more viable alternative to SharePoint. Antebi also says that using OffiSync with Google Sites actually has a few advantages over SharePoint. For one, he says that Microsoft requires the use of the latest version of Office if you want to use the most up to date version of SharePoint, while OffiSync lets users work with any version of Office alongside Google Docs and Google Sites. Google has endorsed the product as well, with Sites PM Scott Johnston saying “Offisync makes it significantly easier for Office users to share information with their coworkers using Google Docs and Google Sites”. OffiSync premium costs
businesses $12 per user per year, and will offer a free 30 day trial. The
company has over 150,000 users of its free version (that supports Google Docs,
but not Sites). OffiSync is still Windows only, but Antebi says that a Mac
version will be released eventually. Crunch Network: MobileCrunch Mobile Gadgets and Applications, Delivered Daily.
Things you can do from here:
![]() FW: Ubuntu 9.10 upgraders report frustrationDear Blog Site: Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 7:43 PM
For Your Information
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via Betanews on 11/9/09
By Katherine Noyes, LinuxInsider Following the Karmic Koala's joyful reception last week, sentiments toward the FOSSy marsupial have become distinctly less enthusiastic in recent days -- at least for some. "Early adopters bloodied by Ubuntu's Karmic Koala" was the headline on a piece that ran in The Register last week, which chronicled multiple cases of frustration among some users upgrading to the new version. "More than a fifth of people upgrading to Ubuntu 9.10 have reported issues they can't fix, according to an Ubuntuforums.org poll," The Register reported. "Only around 10 percent of those upgrading or installing reported a completely flawless experience." A biased snapshot Of course, the opinions represented in said poll aren't exactly representative of the population at large, as Slashdot bloggers quickly pointed out, biased as it is toward those with problems. In fact, at the top of the poll, the following red-ink warning is given:
Nevertheless, word of The Register's report quickly spread, and bloggers far and wide didn't hesitate to register their own reactions. "I upgraded to Ubuntu 9.10 and it is quite buggy," wrote MichaelSmith on Slashdot, for example. "Much more than previous releases. I have had to go back to the NDIS wrapper to use my WG511 PCMCIA wifi adapter. I haven't had to do that in years." On the other hand: "The statistics derived by The Register are invalid, and probably quite wrong, being from a non-representative self-selected subset of Karmic installations or upgrades," countered AliasMarlowe. "Here's another non-representative data set: I have installed or upgraded 4 PCs from Jaunty to Karmic at home (2 upgrade 32-bit, 1 upgrade 64-bit, 1 conversion 32-bit to 64-bit)," AliasMarlowe added. "All went flawlessly, even the migration of user accounts and reinstallation of applications (including commercial paid-for apps) on the 32-bit to 64-bit reinstallation." Over on LXer, meanwhile, HoTMetal warned, "I've said it before and here it goes again: never, ever upgrade. Clean installs are the only way to go." Then again: "Never upgrade? Clean install only? That's Windows-think," shot back tuxchick. "I have Debian boxes that have gone for years without ever needing a reinstallation, upgrade and dist-upgrade all the way. Though with Ubuntu upgrading to a new release has always been a roll of the dice." Bottom line? If you're upgrading, be prepared at least for the possibility of a bumpy ride early on. Does Wine make Linux too loose? The problems one is likely to encounter with Linux tend to pale by comparison with the security problems one is likely to have using Windows. Unless, that is, you're using Wine. Indeed, alert blogger fsufitch recently uncovered a situation in which Wine allowed Linux to get infected by a virus targeting Windows. "Wine emulates Windows well enough to get infected by a Windows virus," fsufitch wrote -- noting, however, that the observed virus didn't work as intended. "So WINE can get a virus intended for Windows, if you jump through some hoops to help the virus along," wrote AliasMarlowe on Slashdot, where bloggers took quick notice of the news. "Color me unworried." Then again: "Linux is by no means impervious to infection, but you would need to really put an effort into getting and staying infected," wrote Jeff901 over on Digg. "Things just don't run without your knowledge or control." And an anecdote: "Using Linux, I'd gotten into the habit of ignoring warnings about all the Web sites I knew spread malware and viruses -- sometimes because I was looking for something, and sometimes just because it's fun to walk through a battlefield with godmode on," JanusTheDoorman began. "Then, because I needed to run certain software for school, I reinstalled Windows onto my laptop, and absentmindedly continued my usual browsing habits for about a week without so much as spybot to keep me safe," JanusTheDoorman added. "The moment of realization was a bit like what I imagine it'd be like waking up in a doorway, noticing a syringe on the ground next to you, and feeling an itch in your arm..." Just how big a security concern is Wine? Linux Girl felt it her duty to ask around. "As long as said virus can't punch through my web browser and install itself, I'm fine with it," Montreal consultant and Slashdot blogger Gerhard Mack told LinuxInsider. "As long as viruses need user intervention to install, we can keep it down to a user education problem." Indeed, "unless there is an inside job like Wine, it is very difficult to get a virus in GNU/Linux," blogger Robert Pogson agreed. "The GNU/Linux ecosystem is so diverse, hackers cannot build their stuff for all the varieties of drivers, kernels, GUIs, apps and builds to make overflows and such to work. They would rather compromise millions of willing zombies running that other OS -- it's just too easy." The result is "1000:1 more security against malware with GNU/Linux these days," Pogson noted. "I love it." "Reading the anguish of users of that other OS struggling for days to cleanse their systems only to reinstall after nothing works brings tears to my eyes," he added. "I just have to tell them about running malware free for eight years without a scanner." Is the Linux user simply more educated? A bigger question lies behind the current news, however, and that's, "Why does Linux not get viruses?" Slashdot blogger hairyfeet told LinuxInsider. "Ultimately, I believe it comes down to the fact that the malware writers know that Linux users are generally more savvy, less likely to fall for tricks, and less likely to fall for the really dumb attacks," hairyfeet said. "Which is why I say, 'Linux users: hope and pray to Linus and RMS you never have a year of a Linux desktop.'" With mainstream users comes "'the Velma problem,'" hairyfeet explained. "Velma is sweet and nice and always remembers your name and all about your family, but Velma has a darker side: she is what we in the repair biz call ... DUM DUM DUM ... the disaster area." Specifically, Velma is a user who "followed step-by-step instructions to turn off her antivirus and put the password in a password-protected .zip file," hairyfeet explained. "For what? It was supposed to be a 'happy puppy' screensaver." Then there's the user who "would run anything -- .exe, .vbs, you name it -- as long as it had the word 'lesbians' in it," hairyfeet added. "So WINE running a Windows virus is nothing more than a 'stupid Linux trick'... for now," he said. "What will be ultimately more interesting is whether the volunteer nature of Linux will hold up to a tidal wave of stupidity if the year of the Linux desktop ever comes to be." The minute they find out the "Velma problem" has come to Linux en masse, hairyfeet predicted, "your old friends in the Russian Business network and their friends in Nigeria and China will be happy to cook up 'Happy_Pup.sh' and 'lesbian_video_player.deb' and nicely provide step-by-step instructions that Velma and all her friends will follow to the letter." Of course, whether those "Velma" users will all be using the same distro is another question entirely, as is whether hackers will be able to do significant damage amid the formidable strength that lies in Linux's diversity. Then, too, there's the fact that any mass migration to Linux will surely have to involve at least some learning and education on the part of all those new users. Dare we hope that the Year of the Linux Desktop -- whenever it happens -- may also bring about the Era of the Educated User? Now that would be a milestone in computing history. Originally published on LinuxInsider © 2009 ECT News Network. All rights reserved. © 2009 BetaNews.com. All rights reserved.
Things you can do from here:
![]() FW: Microsoft's Top 3 advances in Exchange Server 2010Dear Blog Site: Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 8:17 PM
Great update from Microsoft on
Exchange and the review from BetaNews.
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via Betanews by Scott M. Fulton, III on 11/9/09
By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews The biggest change to Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 was supposed to have been the introduction of something called Unified Communications -- the introduction of a singular console for the handling of all forms of digital communication, wrapping voice mail, instant messaging, and e-mail into a single delivery system. History may yet vindicate UC as the product's singular achievement. But in the near term, administrators credit Exchange more for what it gives them than the world at large. In that light, the inclusion of PowerShell as not only the underlying language of the system but as its engine as well, changed everything for the admin. It may very well be why the product has surged to a two-thirds market share, by some estimates, over once formidable competition such as Lotus Notes. So learning a lesson from history, the message from Microsoft with regard to Exchange Server 2010, which went on sale this morning, is about new levels of control. The idea that e-mail, or any kind of communication, once sent unto the vast Internet is out of the sender's hands -- like a paper sailboat launched from a river pier -- is what the Exchange team has been working to combat. During a beta program which Microsoft says involved dozens of universities, signing up some ten million participants worldwide, the company has completed development of a browser-based endpoint for ES 2010-delivered e-mail that is not only more manageable than Outlook 2007, but that has beaten Outlook 2010 -- the product it's supposed to be derived from -- to market by perhaps eight months. What that means is, hopefully for a short time only, there will be a functionality gap between what the new Outlook Web App -- hosted by ES 2010 -- can deliver compared to what Outlook 2007 provides. If Julia White, Microsoft's marketing director for Exchange, has anything to say about it, that gap will be shorter rather than longer, but it's not unnoticed.
Microsoft Outlook Web App previews the textual contents of a voice mail. [Courtesy Microsoft Corp.] White spoke with Betanews this afternoon from Berlin, where she had just completed a TechEd Europe demonstration along with Corporate Vice President Stephen Elop. "Obviously Outlook Web Apps comes with Exchange, so they can use that today; when Outlook 2010 comes out, they can use that," said White, "and we are absolutely planning support for Outlook 2007 in the roadmap here. So it's on the agenda, and we will actually be getting to it." Much of what Exchange 2010 will deliver absolutely depends on this upgrade to Outlook 2007, as you'll see. We asked White for her take on what she would consider the top three enhancements to administrator functionality in ES 2010. #3: Transport Protection Rules Number three on this list is the Transport Protection Rules system, which we described earlier today. It enables the administrator to designate the extent to which the recipient of a message can utilize its contents, based upon rules that enable Exchange to analyze the content itself. "In the demo this morning, I set a Transport Protection Rule based on a keyword. But actually another aspect of that is, those rules can be set based on the sender, the recipient, or even contents of an attachment," White told Betanews. "Any of those things can be triggered; and having the ability to centrally decide what gets encrypted and what doesn't, is a really powerful tool. With end users, it's hard for them to keep up with corporate policy, pay attention to it, or know about it. So oftentimes it's unintended, versus intended, when information isn't protected. Having that essentially managed brings peace of mind, for the users as well as the IT pros." The ability to analyze an attachment takes place on a granular level, White told us. If a PowerPoint presentation, for example, were to contain the words "Microsoft Confidential," that fact alone would trigger a rule that automatically encrypts the message outgoing, and that restricts the recipient from being able to pass it on. #2: Role-Based Access Control One of the least loved features of Exchange, or anything Microsoft has ever done, disappears in ES 2010: The Access Control List is a Registry-based system for designating which identified and authenticated user had permissions to control specific objects. It has often been a ridiculous concept that starts one off with the assumption that everyone has rights to everything, and that ACLs provide the exceptions. Exchange Server 2010 replaces this entirely with a concept that is much more rooted in Active Directory. Now, the administrator starts off in a universe where nothing is allowed until groups of users are added into the pool of permissions. Those groups that are added in are called management role groups, with the concept being that a predefined set of roles exist (a concept made popular by Windows Server 2008), and that groups of users or individual users are delegated those roles. This morning, Julia White demonstrated how Role-Based Access Control enabled an otherwise unprivileged user to search for e-mails through multiple mailboxes on the company's behalf (in this case, Microsoft's usual fictitious firm, Contoso). Her system was delegated a role that let her perform the search, without having to delegate other responsibilities and privileges of a much higher administrative order. "A compliance officer might get that level of capability," White explained to us, "but a help desk might have the rights to increase mail box quota size. Maybe HR would be given the ability to update contact information on behalf of employees. Extending all the way down to end users, even that same roles-based administration capability -- end users can now create and manage their own distribution groups within Exchange. That no longer requires a call to the IT pro...usually that's a lot of overhead." Next: The best thing ever to happen to old e-mail... #1: Integrated archiving During the late 1980s and into the '90s, Microsoft liked to centralize things, thinking that if everything were in one big pile -- as Arlo Guthrie put it -- that would beat two or more little ones. The System Registry is, and remains, one big pile. Another -- which can stink just as bad -- is the .PST file, the single personal folder file that is created on the client side by Outlook. It is every Outlook user's nightmare, especially since Office buries this file typically in a black hole within a hidden directory inside each user's Documents folder. For individuals who receive hundreds of thousands of e-mails per year (I'm on that list, believe me), the archiving process has cost users many a weekend. With Exchange Server 2010, Microsoft marketing director Julia White told Betanews today, is the ability to perform this process completely in the background. But in addition, the archived items remain indexed and available, still listed as part of "Personal Folder" but stored separately. "Today, the vast majority of e-mail actually sits on the local hard drive on those .PST files," White remarked.. The end users love it because they can file as much as they want in there, and they have access to it when they're on their PC. But from an administrator's perspective, they don't like them because they're very expensive to discover, they get lost, they get corrupted, it's a liability and a lot of overhead for the IT organization. "So with integrated archiving...it doesn't have any change to the end user experience," she continued. "That Personal Folder appears, but the archive shows up and it looks just the same, it's another folder in your file directory, it looks like a secondary Inbox...The benefit is, it's all sitting on Exchange, so it's not going to get corrupted or lost. It's very easy to discover -- that time comes down dramatically. And as a user, you get access to it through Outlook Web App, [as opposed to] on the local hard drive." Here, White took the bold step of proclaiming OWA as superior to Outlook, in that users still get full access to their mail (albeit with transport restrictions), but without having to keep those multi-gigabyte .PST files locally: "What got us into this in the beginning was when we talked to our Exchange customers as we were planning [ES] 2010, and we found out that 20% of Exchange mailboxes have an archive on them today, but over 60% said it was important to them. It's scary, because there's not a mailbox out there that shouldn't be archived for one reason or another. What we heard from them was, 1) the cost and overhead of maintaining and managing another system -- new tools to learn -- was too expensive; and 2) the end-user experience. Oftentimes you have an archive today, you have to go to a different UI to retrieve the mail, or the performance is really poor on the archived mail. Because what they do is called 'stubbing,' which means they literally just leave a little bit of the e-mail in the Inbox, and the rest of it sits out on a third-party system. So the performance has to go bounce between multiple systems, so it's very slow. "If end users don't adopt it, it doesn't work," White remarked. "So this clears the hurdle of both the end user experience as the IT pro cost and management perspective." That 70% cost savings claim During this morning's presentation at TechEd in Berlin, Microsoft CVP Stephen Elop made the staggering claim that within a group of 100 companies testing Exchange Server 2010 over the last year, some were able to cut their administrative costs over earlier versions of Exchange by as much as 70%. As is Betanews' custom (and as is the custom of Betanews readers who see anything in double-digits beside a percentile mark), we asked how that figure was obtained. For instance, we've seen companies in the past that said the expenditure to do something this year was X% lower than the expense to do something in the past, and that typically refers to the fact that memory or storage or processor power is just that much cheaper. That's not really savings; that's a factor of the economy. So what is this 70% savings a factor of? "A big cost driver is storage," responded White. "We know the storage aspect of e-mail, it's a lot of information and it can get expensive. Traditionally, Exchange was deployed always on a storage-area network, which was fine back in the day when you had a 200 MB mailbox. Obviously, that's not sufficing anymore, and 10 GB is becoming more of a standard. Supporting that kind of mailbox storage size on a SAN becomes cost-prohibitive. "So what we've done in Exchange 2010 is two things: First, we dramatically improved performance, tenfold over Exchange 2003. When I say that, I mean the time it takes to read and write information to the disk. What that enables is world-class support of low-cost storage options -- direct-attached storage, SATA, even in a JBoss configuration. So big, slow disks, you can run Exchange without any performance or reliability impact." NEC Philips, for example, was able to increase its storage capacity by a factor of eight, while simultaneously reducing costs by a factor of four, White said; and Germany-based hosted service provider Elabs was able to reduce its storage costs by 70%. Isn't that saying that the expenditure this year is 70% or so less than the expenditure for a similar service in 2003? Yes, according to White, but that's in terms of operating cost run-rate, which is figured according to time and not total investment, especially since companies don't always purchase storage capacity all up-front. Betanews also learned today that Microsoft's SMB Windows Server bundles, Small Business Server 2008 and Essential Business Server 2008, will not be updated immediately with Exchange Server 2010. Those bundles may continue to be sold with Exchange Server 2007 for at least several more months down the road.
Things you can do from here:
![]() November 09 Fw: AT&T intros USBConnect Lightning for 7.2Mbps serviceFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 1:59 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: AT&T intros USBConnect Lightning for 7.2Mbps
service Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via Engadget by Chris Ziegler on 11/9/09
When
you're rolling out a new 7.2Mbps upgrade to your
network, it naturally helps if you've got some compliant hardware in the stable
-- so to that end, AT&T has announced its USBConnect Lightning from Sierra
Wireless today. Apart from 7.2Mbps downlink capability, the new model's little
more than a run-of-the-mill USB stick so there's not a lot to say about it,
though it features a trick swiveling USB connector that should make the thing
more likely to work with unusual (and unusually tight) port configurations.
It'll be available on November 22 for free after rebate on contract, just in
time for service launches in Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles
and Miami expected by the end of the year.
Filed under: Wireless AT&T intros USBConnect Lightning for 7.2Mbps service originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:54:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds. Read | Permalink | Email this | CommentsThings you can do from here:
Fw: Free SharePoint 2010 TrainingFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:00 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Free SharePoint 2010 Training Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via MSDN Blogs by jamespru on
11/9/09
Please share the following information with your development teams. Lots of great content, demo code, and instructor lead labs.
Today, Channel 9 launched two new training courses for SharePoint 2010 and
Office 2010 created by developers for developers. Channel 9
has always been about giving direct access to the engineers and future
technologies from Microsoft, and now we’re extending this successful formula to
bring you training that will allow developers to get started on learning about
emerging technologies at their own pace. Today you’ll find extensive
instructor recordings from top MVPs on how to develop against both SharePoint
and office 2010. We’ll also be publishing more content at the beginning of
December that will include hands-on labs, source code, and much more! All of
this free for you to consume or download at your own pace. SharePoint 2010 Developer Training See how SharePoint 2010 has evolved into a first-class developer platform. Also, learn how SharePoint 2010 provides the business collaboration platform for developers to rapidly build solutions using familiar tools such as Visual Studio 2010 and SharePoint Designer 2010 through this self-paced course.
Office 2010 Developer Training Discover how Office 2010 Beta is a broadly extensible platform for building
information worker productivity solutions and see how developing for Office with
Visual Studio 2010 makes this easy. See online presentations with demos that will help you get
started developing solutions from Add-ins to full featured Office Business
Applications (OBAs) using Visual Studio 2010 with Office 2010 and SharePoint
2010 as the core platform. We hope you enjoy this initial set of training videos and will check back with Channel 9 in the near future as we build the learning center out to support SharePoint and Office 2010 development. Things you can do from here:
Fw: Exchange Server 2010 goes live, will extend rights-managed e-mail to browsersFrom: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:02 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Exchange Server 2010 goes live, will extend rights-managed
e-mail to browsers Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology http://www.ceektechnology.com Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via Betanews by Scott M. Fulton, III on
11/9/09
By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews
These rights management features, called Transport Protection Rules, will enable admins to generate extensive rules that restrict, where necessary, an e-mail recipient's ability to make alternate uses of the content of e-mail, including simply copying and pasting its text elsewhere, if messages are deemed confidential. Corporate Vice President Stephen Elop and Exchange product manager Julie White demonstrated TPR to a TechEd crowd that appeared, at least from the live feed from Berlin, to be less-than-capacity, though which Microsoft described as a sellout crowd of 7,000. During this morning's demo, White showed how OWA typically enables the e-mail client to prohibit unrestricted use of an e-mail's content if the sender explicitly flags the mail as confidential. Transport Protection Rules, by contrast, enables the creation of a policy restriction template that may be applied whenever any content sent from a specified account meets the criteria. That criteria includes the inclusion of phrases within the content of the mail itself -- White's demo involved the phrase launch plans.
A TPR can be designed, the demo showed, where a rule can search outgoing content for the specific phrase, and if that phrase is located, Exchange can apply the confidentiality rule that the original sender may have neglected to apply. The message becomes confidential because content is always being evaluated by Exchange. The restrictions, including inability to copy and paste text or to forward the message to other recipients, may be enforced on non-Microsoft browsers including Firefox. In fact, TechEd attendees this morning saw more of Firefox than Internet Explorer; and when Elop pointed this out, attendees offered the biggest round of applause of the day. "Integrated information rights management is now natively supported within Outlook Web App," said White, "so that now users can create protected messages without needing an additional plug-in, or taking any extra steps. And that means fewer support desk calls for you [the admins]." TPR was perhaps one of the few Exchange features that was actually new to at least some of the admins in the audience today, as Microsoft execs would later acknowledge that the ES 2010 beta program was perhaps the largest in the company's history -- even larger than for Windows. The reason, stated Corporate Vice President Chris Capossela during a staged Q&A following the TechEd keynote, was that a multitude of colleges worldwide adopted Exchange during the beta program, and signed their students up. Over 10 million students worldwide effectively became users of Exchange Server, and many of those effectively of the new Outlook Web App. So some of the other features execs showed off today ended up being old news to many, including how Exchange and OWA implement conversation view -- the ability to automatically categorize e-mails as threaded conversations based on their subject lines -- and the "Ignore Conversation" feature, which lets the client skip future messages belonging to unwanted conversations. At one point, Elop prodded the audience for a response. "Some applause, something, anything?" he asked. "A little love, please?" Today's Exchange rollout comes on the same day as Cisco announced its own Unified Communications System 8.0 platform update, which integrates a new collaboration toolkit and a hosted e-mail option, putting Cisco in direct competition with Microsoft Exchange and Lotus Notes. This morning, Capossela dismissed Cisco's move by painting it as something less than unified, pushing Exchange as a product that has grown organically over the years "rather than stitching together acquired products and calling that the solution," referring to Cisco's propensity for acquisition. Cisco's platform does include the secured instant messaging tool it now calls Unified Presence 8.0, but which came to prominence as Jabber prior to a Cisco acquisition in September 2008. Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009 Things you can do from here:
Fw: RIM unveils tighter Adobe partnership, new app payment platform, OpenGL ES s...From: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:06 PM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: RIM unveils tighter Adobe partnership, new app payment
platform, OpenGL ES s... Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology http://www.ceektechnology.com Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via Engadget by Chris Ziegler on 11/9/09 There
aren't any new devices in the mix, but RIM has unleashed a torrent of BlackBerry
OS-related news today at its BlackBerry Developer Conference in San Francisco
that's sure to make devs happy in the short term -- and you know how that goes:
when devs are happy, it doesn't take long before end users reap the benefits.
Here are the highlights:
Filed under: Cellphones RIM unveils tighter Adobe partnership, new app payment platform, OpenGL ES support, more originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds. Read | Permalink | Email this | CommentsThings you can do from here:
FW: Windows 7 Planning Tools Ease the Upgrade ProcessDear Blog Site:
Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 11:22 AM
For Your Information IT
Community
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via Latest from Computerworld by (Tony Bradley) on 11/9/09
Things you can do from here:
![]() FW: Events This Week – November 9th, 2009Dear Blog Site: Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 9:28 AM
For Your Information IT
Community
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via MSDN Blogs by gduthie on 11/9/09
Here are the events listed in Community Megaphone for the next week (or so) for the Mid-Atlantic area, as well as webcasts of interest…this list includes events imported from the UGSS event calendar, and all events entered in Community Megaphone are also automatically synced to the UGSS event calendar: · The U.S. Public Sector Virtual Launch:
The New Efficiency - Windows® 7, Windows Server® 2008 R2, and Microsoft
Exchange Server 2010 · Hampton Roads .NET Users Group -
November Meeting · Sahil's favorite things about
SharePoint 2010 · Microsoft Developer Dinner for
Partners · RockNUG Release 3.5
· MSDN Events Presents: The MSDN Mid
Atlantic Roadshow · Mature Your Process with Continuous
Integration · 15 Minutes of Fame
· Frederick .NET User Group Monthly
Meeting Want your events listed? You can add them here. You can also add your events via the Community Megaphone web service API, which is now live. You can get more information on the API, and how to sign up, at http://www.communitymegaphone.com/API.aspx. You can also email me for more information.
Things you can do from here:
![]() FW: Oct. 26 - Nov. 8 Hot-Fix KB articles Weekly Release - Windows Legacy ProductsDear Tech Site:
For your Information
Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 2:37 AM
For Your Information
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via TechNet Blogs by Content Team on 11/8/09
Things you can do from here:
![]() FW: Google making Waves across all its Apps?Dear Tech World
Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 5:11 AM
Well lets see if this is true.
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via Engadget by Thomas Ricker on 11/9/09
We just received a set of screengrabs from an anonymous source giving us a glimpse at what appears to be Google's (and thus, the world's) future interface to its web applications, Gmail in particular. While we were originally tempted to ignore them, communications with the tipster would indicate genuine insider knowledge. Regardless, we can not independently confirm the authenticity of these images. Having said that, the pics demonstrate a more unified apps interface based on Google's Wave and accessible from any browser (as they are now). Specifically, we're told that "the goal is to provide a consistent experience throughout all Google Apps and blur the line between the browser and the website (e.g. drag and drop, right-click, etc.)." Something that certainly makes sense to us based on what we know about Google's tender approach to its Chrome browser and its future "lightweight" Chrome OS. If true then this "work in progress" also hints at the importance of Wave to the future of Google. Then again, it could be just one of many possible interface concepts from Google's burgeoning developer's sandbox. Filed under: Software Google making Waves across all its Apps? originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:34:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Things you can do from here:
![]() FW: Gigabyte fixes iPhone sync issue with BIOS updateDear Tech World
Sincerely,
Sent: Monday, November
09, 2009 9:11 AM
For Your Information Tech World
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via Engadget by Vladislav Savov on 11/9/09
Filed under: Cellphones, Desktops Gigabyte fixes iPhone sync issue with BIOS update originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:47:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Things you can do from here:
![]() November 08 FW: 7 posts on Windows 7Dear Blog Site: Sincerely,
Sent: Sunday, November
08, 2009 5:09 AM
For Your Information
Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:
via TechNet Blogs by indiamvp on 11/7/09
Windows 7 is here, there, and everywhere. And so for the weekend, we pick seven fine posts from MVP blogs where they share tips, tricks, and how-tos for Windows 7.
Big props to Windows Desktop Experience MVPs Manan Kakkar, Vishal Gupta, and Nirmal TV, Windows Live MVP Vasudev G, and Setup & Deployment MVP – Vijay Raj.
Things you can do from here:
![]() Fw: Test of 16 Anti-Virus Products Says None Rates "Very Good"From: Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing
Manager
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 1:58 AM
To: Christopher McMillan
Subject: Test of 16 Anti-Virus Products Says None Rates "Very
Good" Christopher McMillan, CIO CEEK Technology Sent to you by Chris McMillan, Federal Marketing Manager via Google Reader:via Slashdot by timothy on 11/7/09 An anonymous reader writes "AV-Comparative recently
released the results of a malware removal test in which they evaluated 16
anti-virus software solutions. The test focused only on the malware
removal/cleaning capabilities, therefore all the samples used were ones that the
tested anti-virus products were able to detect. The main question was if the
products were able to successfully remove malware from an already
infected/compromised system. None of the products performed at a level of 'very
good' in malware removal or removal of leftovers, based on those 10 samples."
Read more of this story at Slashdot. Things you can do from here:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|